Maffi has done a huge amount of useful reporting recently. And especially on the work going on at Isis Lock in central Oxford, where the canal joins the Thames.
In a 16th September post called Well done, BW! Maffi started with praise for a new floating pontoon below the lock, designed to make it easier for boats coming off the Thames:
I can't quite see why it needs to be floating. If the river rises enough to warrant it being a floater boats will not be moving on the water.
But never mind it has been long overdue and is most welcome.
They are still working on the bank edge, but the finished article will, I am sure, be very aesthetic and, more importantly, practical.
(I love Maffi's last sentence above. It reminds me of when I helped to open a rustic-looking restaurant in Putney about 25 years ago. A few months after it opened, my 4-yr-old niece dropped by with her mother to say hell0. As they left, the little girl, impeccably polite, said "Goodbye, Uncle Andrew - we'll come again when it's finished.")
It's obvious why BW, even though cash-strapped, felt the need to install a pontoon below Isis Lock. Maffi himself admits the easiest way to work the lock single-handed is to nestle the bow of the boat against the bottom gate and put the propeller in gentle forward thrust to keep it there while you work the locks. This method is an official no-no, not least because it needs to be gentle if you are not to risk damaging the gate, but I've also done it myself in the past. But then, I'm as experienced as Maffi.
The photo below, taken in 2006, shows Isis Lock from the bottom end, looking uphill, with an Oxford Narrowboats boat coming down through the lock. I don't have any photos of the site as it is now.

But Maffi's praise turns out to have been faint indeed. Last week he followed up with a post titled Isis Lock, which says:
It is only in the cold light of day that what seemed like a good idea at the time suddenly becomes a nightmare.
The lock mooring at ISIS LOCK is a needed facility. Given time it may work but now I have come down the lock and and tried turning (both left and right) I have to say it is an accident waiting to happen.
Listening to others who have tried to use it and now having done the turn round out of the lock myself, I say it is probably the singularly most ill-conceived ‘improvement’ I have yet to see on the canal.
Maffi goes on to explain in words and pictures - in both the post above and a second post called Isis Lock 2 - how he believes that while the whole project might have been honourably conceived, he thinks it's been poorly designed and shoddily executed.
What this project needed was a good edge with bollards. what we got was a bad edge no bollards and a pointless floating pontoon. So in fact BW spent hundreds of thousands of pounds on a white elephant.
Aside from the pontoon itself, new pillars have also been installed, midstream, to hold a new barrier, and this, Maffi argues, is actually going to make it harder to turn a longer boat into and out of the lock.
British Waterways have put the boating public in danger by failing to consult the proper people before installing this pontoon and poles. I cannot believe that any thinking person would have done anything so utterly stupid.
The minimum requirement now is for BW to remove the poles. No arguments, just get rid of them, then everyone can all sit down to look at this ‘improvement’ and see what can be salvaged.
In a further post, BW Farce, he draws attention to unlicensed boats which are already tying up to the pontoon for convenience without using the lock.
I don't think I've ever seen such a splendid example of faint praise that ended up as such damnation.
Maffi is not alone. Mortimer Bones also has stern comments about this project - see her illustrated post What on EARTH possessed them?, where she concludes "it looks incredibly dangerous". Boat safety inspector Mark Paris added a comment to her post:
The best bit is BW were told before they put the posts in that they were in the wrong place but they still put them in.
I don't know where Mark got his source, but if he's correct, there are questions to answer.
Is this Isis Lock project on a parallel with the 'bollards' controversy of a couple of years back? As I recall, BW still feels it made a good call on that issue but concedes that it should have consulted and executed better.
Update: Mortimer Bones blogs: :
BW say it was in collaboration with the EA and the EA say it has nothing to do with them. I can quite believe it has nothing to do with the EA because the EA are quite good at lock landings and flood control and the works at ISIS lock look as if they are a million miles away from EA engineering.
Recent Comments