Who is behind 'Narrowboat World'? This online magazine puports to be the most visited site on the web - 138,000 in October alone. It's a lively piece, full of genuine news, althhough overshadowed by a lot of opionation. There's no real identity, no way of getting in touch with it, except through an anonymous email.
I emailed the one link to ask who was behind it, and why. Were you, I asked, the 'Victor Swift' who is the only bylined name on the site? Back came a prompt reply saying "No, Victor Swift is a contributor to the site. I am the editor - a spin-off as an ex newspaper editor of 28 years."
I asked why the coyness, why no personality. "If you pick any newspaper up, you will see there is no 'ego trip' of names of editors", he teased. "[It's] how I was brought up!"
This presumably marks him as an old Fleet Street hand, where a desk job never got any recognition, and was proud to be so anonymous. It's not the way of the modern press, of course. And I'd argue that it's even counterproductive. Nowadays we *want* our news to come from personalities.

I've since heard from other sources that 'Tom' is someone called Tom Crossley, and that 'Victor Swift' is indeed his nom de keyboard, the name he uses to distance himself from responsibility for controversial opinions. I don't know if this is true, but I've heard his opinions are often read with disfavour at British Waterways. And a quick scan of 'whois' tells you that the site is registered with one Thomas Crossley at Unit 3 Sutton Springs Wood, Chesterfield - which tallies with the fondness of 'Victor' for the Chesterfield canal. The coyness concludes with a given email address of '[email protected]'.
That said, I personally think it's a lively, interesting site, with some interesting opinions and real news that one might overlook on the some of the stodgy printed pages of the stodgy canal magazines.
It's hard to navigate around NBW though, and I wish there was a way to search, to cross-reference stories, and there aren't even any external links. He (Tom? Victor?) disagrees strongly that it's hard to navigate. Indeed, he says no page is more than two clicks away from another. But then he writes the damn thing and he knows where to go. And he knows what such vague button captions as 'topical', 'basic' and 'bandits' mean.
I also think the lack of external links makes it too pleased with itself, too unwilling to share information, and too insular.
Yet, ultimately, it's updated regularly without fanfare, making it rare amongst waterways web sites, most of which remain 'under construction' or updated barely once a year. And with something new and interesting every week, albeit opinionated, it's hardly surprising it claims such high readership. Or at least, clicks.
Recent Comments