The IWA today announced that MPs are tabling an Early Day Motion protesting about the proposed selling of 22 Thames lock keepers houses.
That this House is concerned about the Environment Agency's proposal to dispose by sale or letting of 22 lock-keepers' homes along the Thames; recognises the importance of lock-keepers being resident in homes adjacent to locks to maintain safety on the river; fears for the welfare of the lock-keepers and their families; and calls on the Government to ask the Environment Agency to re-examine its decision so as to protect this unique part of the nation's river heritage and the tradition of lock-keepers living at the site of locks.
(Phew, one tradition of Parliament that needs to be abolished is the single-sentence resolution)
Hot on its heels (it's presumably a good day to bury bad news) comes today's British Waterways' announcement that it's going to review its own 'residential property estate' (i.e. canalside homes):
The review will consider if there are better ways in which the estate, which includes a number of operational as well as heritage buildings, could be managed and cared for whilst making a greater contribution to the cost of maintaining the waterways network.
... Residential properties, which represent around ten percent of BW’s estate by value, generate very little income for reinvestment in the historic network.
Robin Evans, BW chief executive, explains: “Whilst ensuring that the operations and heritage of the waterways are safeguarded, the review will consider if there are better ways over and above the status quo to get more public benefit from our estate.
"Two options include transferring properties into a specialist associate company part-owned by BW or placing parts of the portfolio on the market and reinvesting the income to generate greater long term funds for canal maintenance.”
I'm sure the usual SOWspects will line up to have their say about that.
400 'waterside properties' [i.e. homes] are involved. But this isn't the first time a lockside home sell-0ff has been mooted.
Last year I said that BW shouldn't let Trevor Skoyles the Hanham Lockkeeper give up his day job - and not only because of his singing!
Of course, canalside properties have been sold off for a hundred years and more. Some of the most characterful are now in private hands. But that's the point - they are in private hands.
Not all. Several lock cottages are actually available for rent, for example from the Landmark Trust at Lowsonford. See Rent a cottage by the canal.
In the last couple of years, two of the waterways most beautiful lockside homes - Claydon Top Lock and Somerton Deep Lock cottages, both on the South Oxford Canal - came on the market privately, having been sold by BW years ago.
The latest BW proposal is simply for a review of what happens these homes. I'm not sure if they consider 'doing nothing' an option.
Whatever does happen, I think they should remain private homes, and ideally be lived in by their owners, and NOT become part of a property empire.
But I've got a further suggestion: Why don't BW rebuild many long-demolished lock cottages, in the original style. I mean, replica lock cottages, built to look as if they've always been there.
There are many locks in the middle of nowhere which could only benefit from having private residents living alongside and keeping an eye on things.
To ice the cake, they could have stables alongside too, just like Claydon Top Lock, above.
I think small lock cottages - with real families living in them, preferably with children - are a blessing to boaters.
Perhaps the dwellers could be part-time honorary lock-keepers, like sub-postmasters. Part of the privilege of living in a lock cottage could be part-time duties, like mowing the grass or planting flowers, and helping out with the keb now and then.
But will BW's 'residential property estate review' consider such bucolic ideas, or are they going to be rather more hard-nosed?
Recent Comments